







Direct email inquiries
to TPF, Inc. Secretary, Martha
Spiegelman,
or by telephone:
413-253-7934
|
|
Review of
Thomas Paine and the Promise of America
by Harvey Kaye
Timothy Nelms / October 2005
Timothy Nelms of Morgantown, West
Virginia, helped organize the Morgantown Thomas Paine Society
which has held Paine birthday dinners for the past four years. He
is active with Freethinkers of Morgantown, which meets biweekly to
discuss books they are reading, such as: The Age of Reason
(Paine); Walden (Thoreau); Tales of the Rational
(Pigliucci); and the favorite so far, Freethinkers: A History
of American Secularism (Jacoby). Nelms is an emergency
physician, avid cyclist, aspiring biblical exegete and a
Europhile. He is a member of Thomas Paine Friends, Inc. Request
to reprint this review must be made to Timothy Nelms who holds the
copyright on this article.
|
Thomas Paine and the Promise of America, by Harvey
J. Kaye, published 2005 ($25 hardcover), is introduced by a warm 1780
oil portrait on the book jacket. The reader is gently led through not
only Paine's life, times and achievements but also the import and
effect thereof over the next 200 years. This text is a definite
must-have for the modern day Paine aficionado.
Ronald Reagan's quote in his 1980 inaugural speech ---"we have
it in our power to begin the world over again" --- opens an
introduction which explains Kaye's purpose in writing this book.
It is about the democratic currents that have run
through the American experience -- currents that Paine did so much
to bring forth, that later generations did so much to sustain, and
that we continue to feel.
In 250 pages of text and 40 pages of references and notes, Kaye
details, decade by decade, the relationship of Paine's ideas and the
evolving American government. From revolution to peace to competing
political forces and social change the connection is made to Thomas
Paine's ideals, with generous quotes and anecdotes.
Various social progress movements in our country's history are
chronicled, with Paine's influence detailed. For instance, Ernestine
Rose traveled the country in the 1840s crusading for women's right to
vote, women's property rights, and abolitionist platforms. Paine was
her hero, and she spoke many times at his birthday celebrations,
saying in 1852:
There is no need to eulogize Thomas Paine. His
life-long devotion to the cause of freedom; his undaunted,
unshrinking advocacy of truth; his deep seated hatred of kingly and
priestly despotism; are his best eulogies ... to honor the memory of
Thomas Paine we must endeavor to carry out what he so nobly began,
for his principles were not for one age or nation, but for all.
Kaye explains well the early (and ongoing) dichotomous approaches to
style of government. On the one hand is the common man's rights,
contributions, and responsibilities -- a more democratic approach
promoted by Paine, Jefferson, Madison, socialists, and modern day
liberals. The opposing approach, by the likes of Edmund Burke, John
Adams, and Alexander Hamilton, favors a more traditional,
aristocratic, hierarchal, property rights style. The influences of
Paine on the former and the attacks on Paine by the latter, through
America's two hundred years, are remarkably repetitive.
The answer to the question of Paine's ignominious absence in our
culture's historical memory is answered by some that it was due to the
democratic ideas in Rights of Man, rather than the religious
critiques in The Age of Reason. In the 1842 Democratic
Review,/i>, W.A Jones (who would "have nothing to do"
with Paine's religion) proposed that Paine's obscurity was due to the
writing to and for "that many-headed monster, the people"
... and that "before Paine the mass of laboring poor were without
a representative" -- that he was
the people's writer -- expressing their views as
well as his own but better than any man could. Clear, plain,
explicit, close, compact, he could be understood by all.
A difficult subject but important omission that I notice in Kaye's
coverage of Paine's influence on our American experience, concerns a
rational approach to religion. Deism has died and atheists are few.
However, even some mainstream religious scholars such as Bishop John
Spong have been advocating a more rational non-miraculous,
non-literal, biblical interpretation. "Seek the truth, come
whence it may, cost what it will" on the library door of an
Alexandria, Virginia Seminary, resonates with Paine's interest to,
... bring man to a right reason that God has given
him ... unshackled by fable and fiction of books by whatever
invented name they may be called.
Possibly the sensitive nature of religion prevents this full
examination now, as it similarly caused such a heated reaction in the
1790s.
I heartily recommend a reading of Thomas Paine and the Promise of
America,/i> and know you who read this newsletter will enjoy it. If
you love Paine you'll love every page, as Kaye has densely filled the
book with much wheat and little chaff. In tribute, here's a Robert
Greene Ingersoll tidbit:
He had more brains than books; more sense than
education; more strength than polish. He had no veneration for old
mistakes -- no admiration for ancient lies. He loved truth for
truth's sake, and for man's sake. He saw oppression on every hand;
injustice everywhere; hypocrisy at the altar; venality on the bench;
tyranny on the throne; and with a splendid courage he espoused the
causes of the weak against the strong -- of the enslaved many
against the titled few.
|